VIDEO BY SALSASSIN
source
Response to Sara Suten Seti Egyptian Olmec claims Part 1
Posted on September 25, 2020 / Posted by integral

About Author: integral
A free-thinking individual who strives to maintain psychological balance between the two polar aspects of Human Nature; Desire and Conscience. However, These conditions can never be balanced because inertia will carry us to extremes. Balance is a constant struggle therefore I live by the principles of the HERU Interface
Somebody in their feelings about SETI coming with facts
he knows it's an Egyptian calendar,but he can't tell you anything about it.the center is the guide of the earth tlaltekutli,giving the face we went to the museum one would think he would know this,but no he has no clue about this culture,yes it is possible of a connection but not in the way he "claims", if any human wishes to find themselves in the calendar system I will gladly help where I can.red black yellow white.restore the humans back to humanity.
those aren't "aztec" those are the murals of cacaxtla, but that's psuedo seti….
Where's your facts at? Prove him wrong with facts not slander. You have none. Hard to digest information that blacks people where the mother and father of the planet. Refer us to any lecture or book to prove him wrong…..
Total garbage.
1. It really is common sense to see the similarities to Egypt. There is even an ank shaped building in ancient Mexico near a pyramid. C'mon dude, common origin
2. Also, I noticed some very, very dark brown Mayan/Aztecs, please don't say it's a tan, that would sound SO desperate, as much of this does anyway.
3.El Negro, one of the Olmec heads, shows a short afro, kinky hair… Explain please.
https://www.google.com/search?q=shaka+zulu+movie&biw=1366&bih=667&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=0ahUKEwjM4pb-oaPJAhVBKyYKHdZFBtgQ_AUICCgD&pageId=100363155784961112068#tbm=isch&q=omlec+head+with+afro&imgrc=_od-a7TFuUqMYM%3A
Man a lot of people miss what he is saying. He's not saying that they were African he is showing that they influenced them. Regardless of the Olmec Heads even though im still waiting on seeing the so called natives with braids. However, when you understand how human features can be determined by climate etc these natives are the strongest candidates for the heads. Whether the Olmec heads are black or not. The Influence is too strong to deny any outside influence. The question is where did the influence come from?
They found the oldest bones and it was black. This whole planet belongs to blacks everyone else is a mutation.
If yo lyn azz have the so call facts as u believe. Challenge the General Seti, then. If U bad like that wit ya knowledge. Challenge the General, mPhuQa! I dare U, chracka. I will set it up.
Because Mexico doesn't have an African history. It has only a Mexican and Indigenous history, with the European and Slave and Free Black descendant history who arrived on European ships. Most Mexicans do not have African ancestry if that's what you are alluding to.
These illegals wish they had non African history to bad to sad
"You tried to compare recent pictures of Mayans with the puffy lips and african nose as proof "
You people have used images of American Blacks with Olmec monuments so what's your point? I HAVE USED IMAGES OF MAYA and I can successfully show modern Maya with the oldest Amerindian photos and images of natives from South America who are isolated, who share near exact, if not exact facial sameness with Maya individuals.
Afrocentric Supremacists idiots ARE losing badly.
"The reason i pointed out what Underhill said was not to state blacks came before Colombus"
Maybe but I don't believe you. That's not what it sounded like what you were saying. After all, your leaders use that quote all the time to justify their claims of some supposed pre-columbian African presence.
Apparently you are a low class liar.
"You tried to compare recent pictures of Mayans with the puffy lips and african nose as proof "
Which is why I used older photos of Fuegian, and isolated tribes such as Xingu Kuikuro, who've had recent contact with westerners since Fawcett, and have no reports of Old World admixture. With Luzia, I used an Awa – only five members of that tribe left, another isolated tribe until very recently. So much for your accusations of my supposed "lying." I think it is the other way around.
I know your feeling cocky for believing you debunked me but The reason i pointed out what Underhill said was not to state blacks came before Colombus. You tried to compare recent pictures of Mayans with the puffy lips and african nose as proof .This admixture tells why today you can compare those faces you use to compare the Olmecs. You cant make an assumption based on the faces of Mayans today. Since today there lies Admixture. Yet you lie and say they are fullblooded without DNA results.. Joke
The reason why the patience goes is because the nature of the Afrocentric.
They cannot discuss anything without fallacy after fallacy, one after the next. They repeat already debunked claims always ignoring what the data actually says. They race bait, they cry racisms and slavery, they "subject-switch," they are living in their own world while at the same time crying about whites. They straw-man you to death, they make threats and cry like bitches, even the men.
No one here is denying what whites did to natives. No one is denying kidnappings in Mexico… You keep harping on these but are irrelevant. I only responded to your comments but more or less explained this is irrelevant.
What the whites did has NOTHING to do with your claims the Olmec were supposedly black.
This is where I become vile and start using words I wanted to refrain from using.
"A pre-Columbian Y chromosome specific transition with its implications for human evolutionary history"
This doesn't really prove anything except some natives mixed with blacks early on, post 1492. Underhill is clear enough that that's not what he meant and his quote via email nicely destroys their claims.
"Researchers have found that some Mayan people have genetic markers, which point to African ancestors."
Of course they did. Because Africans, slave and free & armed, were brought to the New World from early on. So they mixed with natives like the Spaniards did.
Of course those towns have higher African admixture because that's were African descendants were more abundant due to the Triangular Atlantic Slave Trade.