International Relations and Co-operation Minister, Ronald Lamola, says there is no persecution of Afrikaners in South Africa.
Lamola has also dismissed the assertion that a group of Afrikaners who left South Africa on Sunday night are refugees.
Addressing the media in Pretoria, Lamola confirmed that President Cyril Ramaphosa will travel to the United States of America where he is expected to meet President Donald Trump.
The Presidency will be communicating the details soon.
SABC News International Editor, Sophie Mokoena has more.
For more news, visit sabcnews.com and #SABCNews on all Social Media platforms.
Please report this hateful and racist video.
Stop talking crap.we white people get billed heavy for municipality acc etc.where most of the blacks get better tarrifs and gets it free.and they work according to surnames that is obvious on the accounts.i know cause i got a black neighbor.
And i can tell you now when most of the whites if not all is gone this country is going down with these big mouths that is eating the tax money now.
So ramaposa and the anc did not say that whites should be slowly boiled in water, but done so slowly that they do not realize it is happening? What a useless and braised news channel you are.
If Trump helps relocate the remaining 4,000,000 white South Africans, he will still be 17,000,000 people behind Biden’s immigration disasters
ANC line" Deny, deny and deny again"
wow the news reader put me to sleep.
You can't refute claims of a genocide without punishing those singing that song. As long as that song can be sung in public, your stance is clear.
Really, then what is all the racial discrimination in order for whites to work and/be sportsman/women with SA’s quota laws. Instead of SA rather working together towards a better SA.
Of course he would say that, look at the color of his skin! Welcome to America, our white brothers & sisters.
The only way to the US is to make that claim no matter what.
You have a big job ahead of you to carefully gather undisputed evidence on every single Afrikaner to prove them wrong. Evidence perhaps dating back to president Madiba's first term.
Let me share just a small part of our experience living in South Africa. I’ve survived two hijackings and a violent home invasion, where the attackers shouted, “We are going to kill you white evils . In that moment, the racial motivation behind the attack was undeniable.
When public figures chant slogans like “Kill the Boer, kill the farmer,” it feels deeply personal—like a target has been drawn on people like us, whether others choose to acknowledge it or not.
And when political leaders like Julius Malema say things like, “We’re not calling for the killing of white people — for now,” how are we expected to feel safe or welcome? Isn’t this, if nothing else, evidence of persecution?
People can argue that crime affects everyone, but what we’ve experienced goes beyond that.
Which they all left
Delusional puppet
South Africa should make a law that requires those who want to leave Africa to pay some amount of their money to South Africa! They are the rich of South Africa, all the money is from South Africa Resources! Trump is taking Africa's money through these white people
HE’S LYING, HE’s EVEN SMILING SAYING THIS.. OVER 1600+ Brutal murders, OVER 11,100 attacks 1997-2017
Record murders in over 20 years and ranked the 3rd most violent country in the world
Crime against humanity of persecution
Elements
1. The perpetrator severely deprived, contrary to international law,21 one or more persons of fundamental
rights.
2. The perpetrator targeted such person or persons by reason of the identity of a group or collectivity or
targeted the group or collectivity as such.
3. Such targeting was based on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in article
7, paragraph 3, of the Statute, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under
international law.
4. The conduct was committed in connection with any act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute
or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court.22
5. The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian
population.
6. The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or
systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
—————-
War crime of wilfully causing great suffering
Elements
1. The perpetrator caused great physical or mental pain or suffering to, or serious injury to body or health of,
one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons were protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
3. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
—
War crime of destruction and appropriation of property
Elements
1. The perpetrator destroyed or appropriated certain property.
2. The destruction or appropriation was not justified by military necessity.
3. The destruction or appropriation was extensive and carried out wantonly.
4. Such property was protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
5. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
6. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
7. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
—
War crime of excessive incidental death, injury, or damage
Elements
1. The perpetrator launched an attack.
2. The attack was such that it would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects
or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such death, injury or
damage would be of such an extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall
military advantage anticipated.36
3. The perpetrator knew that the attack would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to
civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such
death, injury or damage would be of suchan extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and
direct overall military advantage anticipated.37
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
Afrikaaners Dont need to take bribes from Iran. ICC and ICJ maybe you black bastards can go and read.
Crime against humanity of persecution
Elements
1. The perpetrator severely deprived, contrary to international law,21 one or more persons of fundamental
rights.
2. The perpetrator targeted such person or persons by reason of the identity of a group or collectivity or
targeted the group or collectivity as such.
3. Such targeting was based on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in article
7, paragraph 3, of the Statute, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under
international law.
4. The conduct was committed in connection with any act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute
or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court.22
5. The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian
population.
6. The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or
systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
—————-
War crime of wilfully causing great suffering
Elements
1. The perpetrator caused great physical or mental pain or suffering to, or serious injury to body or health of,
one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons were protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
3. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
—
War crime of destruction and appropriation of property
Elements
1. The perpetrator destroyed or appropriated certain property.
2. The destruction or appropriation was not justified by military necessity.
3. The destruction or appropriation was extensive and carried out wantonly.
4. Such property was protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
5. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
6. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
7. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
—
War crime of excessive incidental death, injury, or damage
Elements
1. The perpetrator launched an attack.
2. The attack was such that it would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects
or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such death, injury or
damage would be of such an extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall
military advantage anticipated.36
3. The perpetrator knew that the attack would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to
civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such
death, injury or damage would be of suchan extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and
direct overall military advantage anticipated.37
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
Crime against humanity of persecution
Elements
1. The perpetrator severely deprived, contrary to international law,21 one or more persons of fundamental
rights.
2. The perpetrator targeted such person or persons by reason of the identity of a group or collectivity or
targeted the group or collectivity as such.
3. Such targeting was based on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in article
7, paragraph 3, of the Statute, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under
international law.
4. The conduct was committed in connection with any act referred to in article 7, paragraph 1, of the Statute
or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court.22
5. The conduct was committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian
population.
6. The perpetrator knew that the conduct was part of or intended the conduct to be part of a widespread or
systematic attack directed against a civilian population.
—————-
War crime of wilfully causing great suffering
Elements
1. The perpetrator caused great physical or mental pain or suffering to, or serious injury to body or health of,
one or more persons.
2. Such person or persons were protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
3. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
—
War crime of destruction and appropriation of property
Elements
1. The perpetrator destroyed or appropriated certain property.
2. The destruction or appropriation was not justified by military necessity.
3. The destruction or appropriation was extensive and carried out wantonly.
4. Such property was protected under one or more of the Geneva Conventions of 1949.
5. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that protected status.
6. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
7. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
—
War crime of excessive incidental death, injury, or damage
Elements
1. The perpetrator launched an attack.
2. The attack was such that it would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to civilian objects
or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such death, injury or
damage would be of such an extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and direct overall
military advantage anticipated.36
3. The perpetrator knew that the attack would cause incidental death or injury to civilians or damage to
civilian objects or widespread, long-term and severe damage to the natural environment and that such
death, injury or damage would be of suchan extent as to be clearly excessive in relation to the concrete and
direct overall military advantage anticipated.37
4. The conduct took place in the context of and was associated with an international armed conflict.
5. The perpetrator was aware of factual circumstances that established the existence of an armed conflict.
Whites discriminated blacks before and now its vice versa
Its always a cycle
The last 20 years ,saps stats 2 farmers murder per week ??
Communists always lie.
When I am not wrong I just shut up
If whites are so well off in sa ….then why are they leaving? Why leave your home and family if youre so well off and supposedly safe?
Then how do you explain 400 farms taken out of productivity because of 400 farmers and their wives and children being murdered in the last year?
Shut up leftie
Liars
As South Africans we support you
Bs.