Can Trump ban South Africa from the G20? | Vantage with Palki Sharma

This year, the G20 summit in South Africa was historic — the first time an African nation hosted the global economic forum. But the moment turned tense when Donald Trump boycotted the event, refusing to send senior representation. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa followed tradition but didn’t pass the gavel to a junior U.S. diplomat, sparking a diplomatic feud. Can Donald Trump ban South Africa from the G20? Palki Sharma tells you.

—

#g20summit #g20southafrica #g20johannesburg #donaldtrump #cyrilramaphosa #racism #firstpost #vantageonfirstpost #palkisharma #worldnews

Vantage is a ground-breaking news, opinions, and current affairs show from Firstpost. Catering to a global audience, Vantage covers the biggest news stories from a 360-degree perspective, giving viewers a chance to assess the impact of world events through a uniquely Indian lens.

The show is anchored by Palki Sharma, Managing Editor, Firstpost.

By breaking stereotypes, Vantage aims to challenge conventional wisdom and present an alternative view on global affairs, defying the norm and opening the door to new perspectives. The show goes beyond the headlines to uncover the hidden stories – making Vantage a destination for thought-provoking ideas.

Vantage airs Monday to Friday at 9 PM IST on Firstpost across all leading platforms.

Subscribe to Firstpost channel and press the bell icon to get notified when we go live.

Follow Firstpost on Website:

Follow Firstpost on Instagram:

Follow Firstpost on Facebook:

Follow Firstpost on X:

Follow Firstpost on WhatsApp:

26 thoughts on “Can Trump ban South Africa from the G20? | Vantage with Palki Sharma | N18G”

The world should tell trump that SA has to be at next summit.

What a clear demonstration of the spoiled brat that Trump is.

Great comment on this idiotic dictator. The USA should be ashamed that they chose him as their leader.

Cyril Ramaphosa is a criminal Liar .

SA is NOT a founding member ..
Founding Members: Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Turkey, the United Kingdom, the United States.

Viva Donald

Wichfull thinking SA

America is like a 40 year old former celebrity who still thinks she’s relevant

South Africa is a failed state! 🇺🇸

The taco felon is making american stupid like him and ignorant that USA and China want to be the leader as they bidding for global leadership…USA under the administration of "making american first"….yea….stupid, ignorance and self serving……USA has lost trade with Canada Mexico China and had even lost greenland….he is going after velnazula because of oil production usa is not drilling like the taco felon directed and is trying to claim oil by bullying or corrupition actions….taco felon is recongnize as an idiot and bullying techniques does not making a country a leader but a loser in the present time of gobal associations and stratagies excellance of which taco fellon is the loser and making ametican the primary loser….

Yaniv Ben-Simon's arrest angered Beltway Handlers.

Trump childish tantrum

Trump is a 🤡

The words white genocide is laughable😂😅😂. Its like saying Santa Clause is real, or Israel is a country

Africa must unite ASAP.

Should they be there in the first place?

In case OWP No. 322/2018 having title
Abdul Rashid Khan
Vs.State of JK through Financial Commissioner J&K Jammu/Srinagar.& ors His Lordship Mr Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal held:
“A dispute between two private individuals concerning the use decided of land does not attract Section 4 of the Common Land Regulations Act, rather fall within the realm of private easementry rights.
The record of the present proceedings shows that the dispute pertains exclusively confined to the petitioner andRespondent No. 5 and does not involve any right of the
general inhabitants of the village. No material has been produced by Respondent No. 5, or placed before the revenue authority or this Court, demonstrating that either
the petitioner or the erstwhile recorded owner, namely Mufti Mehraj-ud-Din, had ever permitted the general public or the village community to use the said land as a
pathway “from time immemorial,” as required by the principle laid down in the cited judgment.
On the contrary, both the orders of the learned Sub-Judge,Pattan (supra) as well as the order of the Financial Commissioner, Kashmir (supra) categorically establish
that, as per revenue records, no pathway has ever existed over the property in question.
In view of the foregoing discussion, it is evident that the impugned orders dated 03.03.2016, 23.05.2016, 27.02.2018 suffer from grave legal infirmities and procedural irregularity. The Tehsildar, Pattan acted without jurisdiction and failed to appreciate the binding effect of the pending civil proceedings of similar issue. The subsequent revival of revenue proceedings by
concerned Tehsildar, without any justification or reference to the pending civil suit, indicates total non-application of
mind. Moreover, the reliance placed by concernedTehsildar on the judgment referred in his order is misplaced as the same was not applicable to the case in hand .
The respondents were under a solemn duty to adhere to the procedure prescribed by law and to ensure that their decision was founded on fairness, reasonableness, and due application of mind. However, the material on record indicates that essential procedural safeguards were overlooked, relevant factors were not duly considered, and the petitioner was subjected to adverse consequences without proper justification.
Such deviation from established norms renders the impugned orders dated 03.03.2016, 23.05.2016, and
27.02.2018 not sustainable in the eyes of law. The respondents, being quasi judicial authorities, are expected to act in a manner that inspires confidence, adheres to the
procedure established by law and by no stretch of imagination can deal with the issue simultaneously which
is substantially in issue before the competent Civil Court. The respondents have acted in blatant violation of the
settled principles of law.
The material on record clearly establish that the dispute pertains to private rights between two individuals and does
not involve any public right or common pathway as contemplated under section 3 of the J&K Common Lands(Regulation) Act, 1956. Therefore, the impugned
proceedings stand vitiated and are not sustainable in the eyes of law.
Accordingly, for the reasons stated hereinabove, the writ
petition preferred by the petitioner is allowed and the orders dated 03.03.2016, 23.05.2016, and 27.02.2018
passed by Respondents 1,2 and 4 respectively are hereby
quashed. The respondents are further restrained from disturbing the present position on the spot and are directed
not to harass the petitioner in any manner. The petitioner shall be entitled to peaceful use and enjoyment of his property in question without any hindrance”

Trump wants the world to be his and dictate every country he can possibly can😂 his desperate for attention, pathetic!!

So Trump is not happy with Blacks hosting G20 we can see and my man will learn because we not stopping.

💥It will behove Firstpost to check out Marco Rubio's most recent article-speech about South Africa's ANC- driven and Marxist, rogue policies and behaviour, so in total disarray and misalignment with American (and most South African) business and Judeo-Christian values.
Get the facts and read the room correctly. This Firstpost report viewed on this podcast is skimpy, politically jaundiced and frayed at the hem.

What does India do for the Indians, coloureds & white south African?

Room was even too warm.See how realived everyone was.Peace rulled inside there.

We have to learn to hold on peace and not deep more any differences. American security stragedies blame Europe too. In one year Amerika has mid terms .