What The Voting Rights Decision Actually Does

What The Voting Rights Decision Actually Does



The Supreme Court struck down Louisiana’s congressional maps in a major ruling on voting rights. In a 6 to 3 decision, the court said the state’s map, which created a second majority-Black district, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The justices ruled the “Voting Rights Act” did not require Louisiana to draw that district, limiting how race can be used in redistricting going forward. The decision leaves the broader law in place, but critics say it significantly weakens protections for minority voters. Jen Rice, reporter with Democracy Docket, explains this decision will make it harder for people to prove racial discrimination in court because they will have to prove intent.

Hello Houston is your connection to the heart of the Bayou City. We dive deep into the stories that matter to Houstonians – from breaking local news to cultural happenings, community voices, and the everyday joys and challenges of life in our vibrant city.

Hosts Ernie Manouse and Celeste Díaz Schurman bring you thoughtful discussions, insightful interviews, and a mix of topics including local politics and city events, Houston’s ever-changing food scene, and feel-good stories from your neighborhood.

Hello Houston streams live on YouTube weekdays from 11 a.m. – 1 p.m. CT, and airs live on Houston Public Media’s News 88.7.

SUBSCRIBE for more local news and information from Houston Public Media:

———-
FOLLOW US:
Instagram:
Instagram:
Facebook:
X:
———-
Houston Public Media is a trusted source for local news, information, and original storytelling in Houston, Texas.

For the latest news and information, visit the Houston Public Media website:

Subscribe to the Hello, Houston! newsletter:

Houston Public Media is a service of the University of Houston.
————-
We can’t do it without you. Support our award-winning community journalism by donating today:

7 thoughts on “What The Voting Rights Decision Actually Does

  1. They weren't able to prove the racial gerrymander before either because they look at effects when the constitution doesn't protect against incidental effects. Remember, disparate impact isn't a real concept as outcomes can never be guaranteed nor does the law and Constitution grant an outcome.

    Read the ruling. It does nothing you claim it does. It removes race as a determinate factor when a State is drawing districts, exactly what the VRA was enacted to do.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *