As bipartisan investigations continue into the U.S. military attacks on alleged drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean and the Pacific, there are questions about the legal justification for such actions.
Then they are not really experts, are they. Anyone the Regime media calls "experts" are not someone to be trusted. Right now I'm trusting the article published by WSJ, interviewing some of those boat pilots. They are absolutely trained as a military soldier and are prepared to give their lives to protect the product. They fully expect to die in the course of their travels. These are not casual fisherman out for a day of pleasant, joyful angling. No. Not even close. These are hardened military style trained narcotics transporters, doing a work that is just as dangerous as hardened soldiers crossing a border to plant explosives and do major work to destroy the enemy from the inside out. In this case, the USA is their enemy. The fact the Dems are so adamant in protecting these insurgents tells us pretty much all we need to know about who they really are and where their loyalties lie. ☠
pearl clutching retards like these are exactly the kinds of people the cartels take advantage of. The whole "arrest" thing hasn't worked for the past 50 years or so, time for something a bit more permanent. This isn't a marvel movie where the hero gets to win while being clean.
Striking Venezuelan terrorists and drug dealers is not fair. US military should target those who pay for drugs and benefit from drugs and crime – US democrats. It's unfortunate, but JFK's party became a terrorist gang.
Notice that this "expert" is a far left radical law professor. Just like radical judges, they go by ideology and not the law. If they did they would know that the president is absolutely within his right to take down narco-terrorists by LETHAL FORCE at any time! Obama did this in Iraq killing THOUSANDS of muslim terrorists. Where was this "expert" then? Or when Obama killed Osama Bin Laden and his associates? Its clear this is just hate Trump and hate Trump some more.
If the strike was war against combatants it was legal. If the combatants were concealing their combatant intent with non combatant appearance they were unlawful combatants with no non combatant protection. That makes the second strike legal.
If these 85 killed were families out on fishing trips that's bound to have evidence reporters can gather. They're not reporting finding it. If they were narco terrorists against whom we've declared war they keep their boating trips secret, and our side keeps the intelligence we gather about their trips secret. Reporters would find, and do find that evidence hard to find.
Its not murky. Stop it. Get over your TDS. Narcotic terrorists and drug cartel are getting exactly what they deserve. You gonna pull a Washington Post? Stir the pot? Think of the tens of thousands of drug deaths each year. Stop
Look at the crisis affecting so many zombies in U.S. cities—addressing drug cartels and the flow of dangerous substances is essential to protect millions of Americans.
What’s “murky” about targeting speed boats carrying illegal drugs to U.S. shores? Their intent is killing Americans for money. Only a Democrat or liberal, or socialist or sociopath would be ok with their intent.
Kill em ALL….. where does a Drug Dealer sit on the chart of Humanity ….. Hmmmm… First you have civilized honest tax paying loving people… 2nd Family oriented good people,,, 3rd Good people … 4th Not so good people ( liars , dishonest people, cheaters ets… )….5th the basic criminal,…6th the Politician …. 7th The Murderer , rapist , etc… Then you have for ….8th our pets dogs + cats + snakes + reptiles + Birds …. 9th Scum people that deserve to die , but we dont Kill them ….. 10Th The Scum DRUG DEALER who shouldn`t be allow to even exist on this chart…. and Then theirs the Democraps in LAST who protects the Scum Dealer ….
US. Government just gonna make it worse. The price of dope gonna go up and so will crime. Ain't nobody pushing dope on anyone. They buy because they want it like a beer or shot of liquor or a cigarette. They make a lot of money off off none violent drug offenders. The war is going to get worse people.
Crap. War has changed, as it always has changed. We no longer picnic on hills overlooking a battlefield. The influx of drugs is now being tackled directly. Our southern border is now controlled, our northern border is a work in progress. Pressure is on China to stop shipping the precursors for fentanyl production. The boats we are sinking have to be hurting the cartels. A JAG lawyer was involved in the sinking of this boat. None of our personnel were injured. War has changed. Job well done. STFU
We believe that time is being wasted by Republicans trying to figure out if we should hang these boat people with a red rope or a green rope. Nobody seems to be putting forward the idea that back "in the day" we used to flag suspect craft down with a siren and/or a loudspeaker command to "Heave to and come about" accompanied with 2-3 seconds of 50-cal 100-200 meters ahead of the boat. This is not some "theoretical outcome," but what both the Navy & the Coast Guard actually did. This administration is lacking the evidence of exogent circumstances requiring the immediate use of deadly force and is instead trying to use its video assets as well as blatant lies by ostensibly lackey public figures to sway public opinion away from what is turning out to be murder on the high seas — with not a hair's breadth of difference from what The United States of America executed Japanese Naval officers for approximately eighty years ago.
Obama drone striked terrorists. While I disagree with 99.99 % of his policies I supported him doing so. Democrats just hate Trump more then they care about Americans.
We want the fentanyl out of the country. The Geneva Convention is a treaty among countries. It's not law in the typical sense of the word and even if it were it only applies to the signatory countries, not transnational criminal organizations engaged in assymetric warfare against the United States.
Putin is killing s whole nation, but whole world ignores it…Trump. Stops druggies and Demorats say. It's a war. Crime !!
This all done legally,
There is nothing morally wrong with killing all drug dealers. Because of them, millions of people, millions of families are miserable,…suffering…
Legal opinions are like verginas. Every female ASSociate law professor has one.
Maryam Jamshidi needs a drug test.
Then they are not really experts, are they. Anyone the Regime media calls "experts" are not someone to be trusted. Right now I'm trusting the article published by WSJ, interviewing some of those boat pilots. They are absolutely trained as a military soldier and are prepared to give their lives to protect the product. They fully expect to die in the course of their travels. These are not casual fisherman out for a day of pleasant, joyful angling. No. Not even close. These are hardened military style trained narcotics transporters, doing a work that is just as dangerous as hardened soldiers crossing a border to plant explosives and do major work to destroy the enemy from the inside out. In this case, the USA is their enemy. The fact the Dems are so adamant in protecting these insurgents tells us pretty much all we need to know about who they really are and where their loyalties lie. ☠
Good job. Good kill. Keep sens them to Davey Jones
pearl clutching retards like these are exactly the kinds of people the cartels take advantage of. The whole "arrest" thing hasn't worked for the past 50 years or so, time for something a bit more permanent. This isn't a marvel movie where the hero gets to win while being clean.
Striking Venezuelan terrorists and drug dealers is not fair.
US military should target those who pay for drugs and benefit from drugs and crime – US democrats.
It's unfortunate, but JFK's party became a terrorist gang.
Professor Jamshidi is upset because the cost of her next 8 ball is going up.
Excuse me. What about the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act that passed in 1986. It allowed us to fire upon drug smugglers in open waters.
Notice that this "expert" is a far left radical law professor. Just like radical judges, they go by ideology and not the law. If they did they would know that the president is absolutely within his right to take down narco-terrorists by LETHAL FORCE at any time! Obama did this in Iraq killing THOUSANDS of muslim terrorists. Where was this "expert" then? Or when Obama killed Osama Bin Laden and his associates?
Its clear this is just hate Trump and hate Trump some more.
Denver 1234567 etc… what a shi@hole!
Denver, wake up!
Do you really enjoy BS like this?
"Experts say". LOL.
If the strike was war against combatants it was legal. If the combatants were concealing their combatant intent with non combatant appearance they were unlawful combatants with no non combatant protection. That makes the second strike legal.
If these 85 killed were families out on fishing trips that's bound to have evidence reporters can gather. They're not reporting finding it. If they were narco terrorists against whom we've declared war they keep their boating trips secret, and our side keeps the intelligence we gather about their trips secret. Reporters would find, and do find that evidence hard to find.
So Democrats are protecting illegals already in America and now the criminals on their way?
Illegal unconstitutional murder
Lost my oldest son to a fentanyl overdose in 2021, we can’t kill enough of these mutts to suit me!
Its not murky. Stop it. Get over your TDS. Narcotic terrorists and drug cartel are getting exactly what they deserve. You gonna pull a Washington Post? Stir the pot? Think of the tens of thousands of drug deaths each year. Stop
Kill 88 violent drug dealers and it’s a war crime but zero concern for the 300,000 children missing at the border. Make it make sense.
This is the US armed forces practicing what you call a FPCON Normal or Alpha (level 1) threat.
It ensures military readiness if China invaded Taiwan.
Look at the crisis affecting so many zombies in U.S. cities—addressing drug cartels and the flow of dangerous substances is essential to protect millions of Americans.
Prove it.
What’s “murky” about targeting speed boats carrying illegal drugs to U.S. shores? Their intent is killing Americans for money. Only a Democrat or liberal, or socialist or sociopath would be ok with their intent.
Kill em ALL….. where does a Drug Dealer sit on the chart of Humanity ….. Hmmmm… First you have civilized honest tax paying loving people… 2nd Family oriented good people,,, 3rd Good people … 4th Not so good people ( liars , dishonest people, cheaters ets… )….5th the basic criminal,…6th the Politician …. 7th The Murderer , rapist , etc… Then you have for ….8th our pets dogs + cats + snakes + reptiles + Birds …. 9th Scum people that deserve to die , but we dont Kill them ….. 10Th The Scum DRUG DEALER who shouldn`t be allow to even exist on this chart…. and Then theirs the Democraps in LAST who protects the Scum Dealer ….
US. Government just gonna make it worse. The price of dope gonna go up and so will crime. Ain't nobody pushing dope on anyone. They buy because they want it like a beer or shot of liquor or a cigarette. They make a lot of money off off none violent drug offenders. The war is going to get worse people.
SMUGGLING DRUGS INTO THE UNITED STATES WILL BE REWARDED BY INSTANT DEATH 🇺🇲🇻🇮
Democrats choosing crime over Americans' lives. Why choose evil pride and no free speech? You kilt Charlie, just leave America, its full, closed.
Crap. War has changed, as it always has changed. We no longer picnic on hills overlooking a battlefield. The influx of drugs is now being tackled directly. Our southern border is now controlled, our northern border is a work in progress. Pressure is on China to stop shipping the precursors for fentanyl production. The boats we are sinking have to be hurting the cartels. A JAG lawyer was involved in the sinking of this boat. None of our personnel were injured. War has changed. Job well done. STFU
Only Democrats would take the side of Fetynal dealers killing Americans… not surprised at all
This is what I voted for.
Tobacco and alcohol kill more people than illegal drugs. Why not ban them?
Let's be real, this is about oil. You think this will stop the flow of drugs? Hahahaha, ok guys.
So they need to use more powerful missiles to get the job done with the first one, got it!
All the drug they are killing Americans. The boat and of it should be wiped out.
We believe that time is being wasted by Republicans trying to figure out if we should hang these boat people with a red rope or a green rope. Nobody seems to be putting forward the idea that back "in the day" we used to flag suspect craft down with a siren and/or a loudspeaker command to "Heave to and come about" accompanied with 2-3 seconds of 50-cal 100-200 meters ahead of the boat. This is not some "theoretical outcome," but what both the Navy & the Coast Guard actually did. This administration is lacking the evidence of exogent circumstances requiring the immediate use of deadly force and is instead trying to use its video assets as well as blatant lies by ostensibly lackey public figures to sway public opinion away from what is turning out to be murder on the high seas — with not a hair's breadth of difference from what The United States of America executed Japanese Naval officers for approximately eighty years ago.
So what happens when they strike the wrong boat? Are there any ramifications?
When it comes to protecting Americans from drug traffickers "lawyers" are not what I would consider experts.
Obama drone striked terrorists. While I disagree with 99.99 % of his policies I supported him doing so. Democrats just hate Trump more then they care about Americans.
We want the fentanyl out of the country. The Geneva Convention is a treaty among countries. It's not law in the typical sense of the word and even if it were it only applies to the signatory countries, not transnational criminal organizations engaged in assymetric warfare against the United States.
WHAT HAPPENED TO THE DEA OR THE COAST GUARD???