Traoré United Three Sahel Armies – A New African War Bloc Is Born

Traoré United Three Sahel Armies – A New African War Bloc Is Born



In this video, Ibrahim Traoré explains why Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger made a historic decision to unite their armies under the Alliance of Sahel States. As terrorism spreads across borders and foreign-led security models collapse, the Sahel is reorganizing its defense around coordination, sovereignty, and African command.

This analysis breaks down what makes the Sahel alliance different from past coalitions, why Western powers are watching closely, and what this shift means for Africa and the global diaspora. This is not just a military update. It is a turning point in how African security, power, and responsibility are being redefined.

#IbrahimTraore #SahelAlliance #AESAlliance
#BurkinaFaso #SahelCrisis
#AfricanSovereignty #PanAfricanism
#AfricaRising #GeopoliticsAfrica #AntiTerrorism #AfricanUnity
#DiasporaVoices #assimigoïta #Tchiani

Disclaimer:
This video is a fictionalized dramatization created with synthetic AI content. While inspired by real figures and historical contexts, the dialogues, events, and portrayals are creatively reconstructed for educational, inspirational, and storytelling purposes. It is not intended to represent real statements or actions, nor to defame, impersonate, or target any individual, organization, or government.

Share:

40 thoughts on “Traoré United Three Sahel Armies – A New African War Bloc Is Born

  1. BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO BURKA FASO and NIGER and MALI….. BRAVO BRAVO BRAVO 👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿 POWERFUL POWERFUL POWERFUL POWERFUL POWERFUL 💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿👏🏿💪🏿👏🏿💪🏿👏🏿🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖🪖❤️❤️💪🏿❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿💪🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿👏🏿

  2. Dear AES’leaders & Presidents, we need a big town or Capital pour AES. Please, think about this dream. If AES has its own bank, has its own TV, has its own deputies, and now has three armies in one under a single commandement , I believe that it is time that AES must have a place where the countries that want to join it can have their embassy and all institutions and facilities that a Capital must have. Please, think about it. I am from Haïti and is leaving from now in New-York.

  3. KingTraore. We need to know exactly those terrorist faces and where they coming from. Mauritania..libya..or where…we need to know so some of us hate dem so bad…and go terrorize their land

  4. 🇺🇸🌿💞💒💓🌿🎄🎊🗽
    Welkom Lider Traore!
    Ok
    Bankiero l invest 5 Bilione dolare and for central Bak Nigeria for kontinue
    us Plan for Burkinia,also kon kontinue
    export to USA oil stone ,Uran,koton
    frutta,kaffe Tea & olys condiment.
    Also gold – diaments & brilantes,pero dys serve fare transport to mio Stock Market USA
    Ok
    Bankiero Also l givet now 5 Bilione dolare
    for Central Bank Nigeria and buy purhase Veapon for you Army
    Per immediatelly destrhktet olys Neck Terroriste,thugede falow Army USA!
    Also per fare gut defence Katolishen
    People!in Nigeria !
    Ok
    myr.count Kazim Joe Dzioba-biden🗽🎠

  5. Of course. Here is a legal thesis structured for submission to the Supreme Court (conceptualized as a domestic high court engaging with international law), and international judicial bodies, on the illegality of colonization and potential legal remedies.

    Legal Thesis: The Persistent Illegality of Colonial Conquest and the Contemporary Legal Obligations of Restitution, Reparations, and Structural Reform

    To: The Supreme Court of the United States (as a forum for redress under domestic law), the International Court of Justice (ICJ), and the International Criminal Court (ICC) (for relevant contemporary implications).

    Subject: A legal argument establishing that the colonization of the Americas and Africa constituted violations of jus cogens (peremptory norms) of international law, both under the legal principles recognizable at the time and definitively under modern international law. This thesis further outlines the consequent legal obligations of successor states and the international community, and proposes actionable judicial pathways.

    I. Introduction: Framing the Legal Question

    The colonization of the Americas (15th-19th centuries) and Africa (19th-20th centuries) is often treated as a tragic historical antecedent to the modern international legal order. This thesis argues, conversely, that these processes were illegal under emergent legal principles of their time and are unequivocally illegal under contemporary international jus cogens norms, which are non-derogable and owed to the international community as a whole. The legal question is not merely historical but implicates ongoing injuries—including systemic dispossession, cultural genocide, and entrenched inequality—that demand contemporary legal redress. This thesis posits that international and domestic courts have a duty to address the legal consequences of these persistent wrongs.

    II. The Illegality of Colonization: A Jus Cogens Violation Ex Post Facto and In Mente

    A. The Fallacy of "Terra Nullius" and the Doctrine of Discovery

    · Legal Argument: The foundational legal doctrine used to justify colonization—the Doctrine of Discovery and its concept of terra nullius (land belonging to no one)—was a legal fiction that violated existing indigenous legal and sovereign systems. As articulated by contemporary legal scholars (e.g., the Mabo v. Queensland decision in Australia) and the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), this doctrine is now repudiated.
    · Application to Courts: The ICJ and domestic Supreme Courts can, and must, judicially notice that the foundational title claimed by colonizing powers was vitiated by a fundamental legal error and bad faith, rendering original title void ab initio.

    B. Violations of Jus Cogens Norms Recognizable in Mente
    Even applying a contextual historical lens, colonization’s core actions violated principles considered foundational to the law of nations by early modern jurists like Francisco de Vitoria (who condemned Spanish atrocities as violating the natural rights of indigenous peoples).

    1. The Crime of Aggression: The use of force to acquire territory and subjugate sovereign peoples was unlawful under natural law principles that predate the UN Charter. The conquest was not defensive but purely acquisitive.
    2. Enslavement and Crimes Against Humanity: The transatlantic slave trade and the systemic enslavement of African and indigenous peoples constituted widespread and systematic attacks on civilian populations, satisfying the modern definition of crimes against humanity. The ICC can consider the ongoing effects of these acts as part of the context for contemporary crimes.
    3. Cultural Genocide and Extermination: The deliberate destruction of populations through disease, warfare, and policy, alongside the eradication of languages, religions, and social structures, meets the spirit and modern definition of genocide (UN Genocide Convention, 1948).

    C. Crystallization Under Modern International Law
    The aforementioned acts are now unequivocally recognized as violations of jus cogens:

    · Permanent Sovereignty Over Natural Resources (PSNR): A principle crystallized in UN General Assembly Resolutions 1803 (1962). Colonial extraction was a wholesale violation of PSNR.
    · The Right to Self-Determination: Enshrined in the UN Charter (Articles 1 & 55) and the International Covenants on Human Rights. Colonialism is defined as a denial of this right (GA Res. 1514, 1960).
    · The Prohibition of Racial Discrimination: The entire colonial project was predicated on a hierarchy of races, violating the International Convention on the Elimination of All Racial Discrimination (ICERD).

    III. Legal Pathways and Remedies: What Needs to Be Done in Court

    Courts must move beyond declaratory judgments to enforceable remedies addressing both past wrongs and present-day manifestations.

    A. Before the International Court of Justice (ICJ)

    1. Contentious Cases: States, particularly those in Africa and the Americas, could bring cases against former colonizing powers for violations of obligations erga omnes (owed to all). Arguments could focus on:
    · Declaratory Relief: A binding declaration that specific colonial acts violated international law.
    · Reparations: Pursuant to the International Law Commission’s Articles on State Responsibility, seeking compensation for unjust enrichment, restitution of cultural property, and guarantees of non-repetition.
    2. Advisory Opinions: The UN General Assembly should request an advisory opinion on: “The legal consequences under contemporary international law of the systemic violations of jus cogens norms during the colonial era, and the attendant obligations of former colonial powers and the international community as a whole.”

    B. Before the International Criminal Court (ICC)

    · While the ICC lacks temporal jurisdiction for historical crimes, its mandate allows it to consider the historical context of ongoing crimes.
    · Legal Strategy: Prosecutions for contemporary crimes (e.g, mass displacement, persecution, pillaging of resources) in post-colonial states could be framed as direct continuations or direct consequences of colonial-era structural violence. This could influence sentencing, victim reparations orders, and the factual narrative established in international law.

    C. Before Domestic Supreme Courts (e.g., U.S. Supreme Court)

    1. Revisiting Foundational Doctrines: Explicitly overturn the “Doctrine of Discovery” as a source of title, as urged by the UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues. This would unravel the legal foundation for many existing property rights claims.
    2. Reparations Litigation: Adjudicate claims for systematic restitution and compensation. This could involve:
    · Land and Resource Restitution: Implementing a legal framework for the return of communal lands and resources, or equitable compensation, drawing from South Africa’s Restitution of Land Rights Act model.
    · Truth and Reparations Commissions with Judicial Authority: Court-ordered commissions with the power to subpoena, make factual findings, and recommend binding reparations packages, including sovereign wealth funds for development, educational endowments, and healthcare infrastructure.
    3. Incorporating International Law: Use the principles of customary international law (jus cogens) to interpret domestic statutes and constitutional provisions regarding equality, due process, and property, mandating a decolonial reading.

    IV. Conclusion: A Judicial Mandate for Decolonial Justice

    The colonization of the Americas and Africa was not merely a historical period but a prolonged, systemic criminal enterprise that violated the most fundamental norms of humanity and legality. The modern international legal system, built on the repudiation of these acts, suffers from a foundational hypocrisy if it refuses to address their legal consequences.

    Courts, as the guardians of legal principle, have a profound obligation:

    · The ICJ must provide the authoritative international legal framework for redress.
    · The ICC must interpret contemporary crimes within the continuum of colonial injustice.
    · Domestic Supreme Courts must dismantle the internal legal architecture of colonialism and provide meaningful remedies for its enduring harms.

    Legal action is not about rewriting history but about rectifying the persistent legal injuries that history produced. A failure to act perpetuates the injustice and undermines the very legitimacy of the international and domestic legal orders. The time for judicial courage and a commitment to transformative justice is now. Amen

  6. Yes, organize & remain loyal to each other, your freedom and future demand it! It's bad enough that they got close with bombs in Nigeria, all done they say, to help. Keep them completely away from your people and your country; Palestians have tried to help them (US&IS are the same entity) and paid dearly for their grace & remain alert and resolute…Chi Miigwech

Leave a Reply to @MukhtaribrahimMusa-x5e Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *